<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Looking for &#8220;The Lost Symbol&#8221;? It&#8217;s Not Here!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/2009/09/24/are-you-looking-for-the-lost-symbol-its-not-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/2009/09/24/are-you-looking-for-the-lost-symbol-its-not-here/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/2009/09/24/are-you-looking-for-the-lost-symbol-its-not-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2852</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/?p=639#comment-2852</guid>
		<description>Nancy, like Paul said, it&#039;s fiction, &#039;nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy, like Paul said, it&#8217;s fiction, &#8216;nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Poelzer</title>
		<link>http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/2009/09/24/are-you-looking-for-the-lost-symbol-its-not-here/comment-page-1/#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Poelzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/?p=639#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>Hidden in allegory; Illustrated by novels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden in allegory; Illustrated by novels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/2009/09/24/are-you-looking-for-the-lost-symbol-its-not-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/?p=639#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a novel.  Brown writes fiction.  Are other novelists&#039; works searched for &quot;inaccuracies&quot;?  No.  Why not? Because they are made up stories, ALL of which are &quot;contrived to benefit the author&quot;.  That&#039;s the point: novelists spin yarns for a living. Brown is just one of many. Don&#039;t even think of looking to novels for the kind of verifiable fact and truth you want to prove; that can&#039;t and shouldn&#039;t be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a novel.  Brown writes fiction.  Are other novelists&#8217; works searched for &#8220;inaccuracies&#8221;?  No.  Why not? Because they are made up stories, ALL of which are &#8220;contrived to benefit the author&#8221;.  That&#8217;s the point: novelists spin yarns for a living. Brown is just one of many. Don&#8217;t even think of looking to novels for the kind of verifiable fact and truth you want to prove; that can&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Dever</title>
		<link>http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/2009/09/24/are-you-looking-for-the-lost-symbol-its-not-here/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Dever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgewashingtonwired.org/?p=639#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this very appropriate response to Dan Brown&#039;s book &quot;The Lost Symbol&quot;.  I am a Bible student and found so many inaccuracies to his &quot;Da Vinci Code&quot; that although his writings are controversial and popular, his creditability is surely lacking.  Even in a &quot;Da Vinci Code&quot;- age it remains important that fact still be proven (especially at Mount Vernon). Otherwise it remains opinion contrived to benefit the author. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this very appropriate response to Dan Brown&#8217;s book &#8220;The Lost Symbol&#8221;.  I am a Bible student and found so many inaccuracies to his &#8220;Da Vinci Code&#8221; that although his writings are controversial and popular, his creditability is surely lacking.  Even in a &#8220;Da Vinci Code&#8221;- age it remains important that fact still be proven (especially at Mount Vernon). Otherwise it remains opinion contrived to benefit the author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

